Feinstain Legacy.

 Seatwarmer Dianne Feinstain passed away, and now the media has to justify their long-standing love affair with her without mentioning Chyna...so the gay agenda is the solution. She is now an "ally" , or co-conspiratrix in the the Alphabet Indoctrination. She would be proud, if she were available for comment.

Elder Abuse...

 Apparently, no matter how old and decrepit she gets, Feinstain is till useful to her handlers. Like SloppyJoe Biden and other politicians she is simply a placeholder for UniParty policies, since none of them have any ideals and never did. I am not suggesting that "term limits" be applied, because that just means a relative, spouse, or colourized version will replace them. My suggestion has always been to treat every member of Congress equally. NO seniority for anyone. Stop rewarding voters for sending the same representative every single time and make them consider whether that candidate is actually a decent choice.

Grassley Shows His Colors.

Chuck Grassley, who allowed Dianne Feinstain's attempt to destroy Justice Kavanaugh, while allegedly chairing the Senate Judiciary committee, on which Feinstain has perched for decades, is now suddenly upset that President Trump has a never-before-used right to hire and fire as a President of the United States! Grassley, who has been in the Senate since the previous century, is a clear indication that the Republican Party will ALWAYS have its share of Republican'ts. We NEED a Third Party, one that will pay attention to the Constitution, and that will put the needs of America over those of, say, Ukraine.
 I do NOT believe that, even if voting were to return properly to taxpayers, who have a vested interest in  the country, voters' choices should be limited by term limits on Congresspeople, because there is a simple way around them, which is to run a spouse for the position once the original Officeholder has been term limited. The best way I can see to limit these seemingly lifetime appointments without hamstringing the voters, is to limit their power once elected. Every Senator and every Representative gets exactly the same vote and no one is guaranteed a leadership position or a Committee chair simply based upon longevity. If the voter who is given the option of Grassley or anyone else, and Grassley were to have the same amount of power as, say, Josh Hawley, the voter might consider a fresh alternative. At the same time, with no guarantee of being able to turn Power into money, the likes of Grassley might just opt for a real job.

Graham Going After Biden Ukraine Konnection!

For a loooooong time it seemed that President Trump was attacked from all sides. As a populist who was only recently attached to the Republican Party he was not the favorite candidate of the Establishment, which saw the Clintons or the Bushes as interchangeable, but were deathly afraid of an outsider looking to clean house, or to at least shake things up. Sadly, Trump either by choice or by lack of experience, didn't do much when he got into Office, but that didn't lessen the reaction to his arrival, a coordinated coup to remove him by the Democrats, which had some Republicans salivating at the opportunity to get back at the American voter for wrongthink. This attitude was notably on display during the neverending fun-eral for John  McCain, who hated Trump and his voters as much as anyone ever could or would.
    It was surprising for many that, during the confirmation hearings into Brett Kavanaugh, used by Dianne Feinstain to deploy Chrissie Boozy-Ford as an alleged "victim" of the nominee, even though she recalled no details, and even though Kavanaugh had served publicly for years, that NeverTrumpers Lindsay Graham and Susie Collins would strongly support not removing Kavanaugh's presumption of innocence and due process and fiercely defend the man. Was it a turn toward Trump? It seemed from public pronouncements that Graham might in fact have softened, but it was more likely that he was offended that Kavanaugh, a Bush appointee, was being so maligned in a way to get at Trump, than in a new alliance with the President. He HAS since been far more vocally supportive of the President's policies than many Republican'ts, and only wavered when it looked as if the President might follow through on his campaign promise to remove us from endless war in the Mideast. Since Trump only moved troops around, rather than bringing them home, he has since regained Graham's support, and it looks as if Graham might actually now be looking into probing the Bidens and their influence peddling in Ukraine, something the Democrats have tried to pin on Trump in an effort to impeach him. What this means, of course, is if the Senate does take up the Shampeachment once Pelosi and her Nancy Boys get it done in the House of Horrors, then there would already be an ongoing investigation into the details happening concurrently. Should prove interesting, and I applaud Senator Graham for showing some backbone, having been disappointed that, for all his bluster, NO one paid a price for what was done to Kavanaugh, when at the very least Feinstain should have been censured.
  One need only look at the photos chosen by Bing for the topic to see that the Establishment is SCARED that Graham might be taking this seriously! Let's hope so.