Bill To Protect Women Again Referred to as "Anti-Trans"..

 More of the same from Bing/MSN/Yahoo as they equate protecting women and girls as an "Anti-trans" Bill, this time from West Virginia, signed by Governor Jim Justice. One linked "source" even decided to get over-emotional and call the Bill "cruel". When has protecting women been "cruel"? I thought the Left even has Bills designed specifically to protect women, despite also claiming that women are no different than men. But expecting consistency is no longer permitted.

Media Twists Defense of Women Into...

 

So I took a break once it appeared that the elections were a done deal in America. Many, many people have commented on that, and I am firmly in favor of NOT voting ever again until the election theft is addressed and retribution occurs. We need an Opposition Party in America, and what we HAVE is a UniParty that, as theater, assigns the Republican't part of the Troupe the role of heel and/or challenger to make it seem as if there is an actual shtruggle going on. The man who was lambasted by a Senator as a "Rapist" and a "Liar" in front of his wife and children PLACED that same woman into the Presidency over fears that the Democrat supporters might burn down the country if he didn't. That is NOT a Representative Democracy. That is NOT a Republic. In any case, here we are. This incensed me, though,as the media, in this case MSN/Bing/Yahoo, is once again twisting an issue with real consequences, for their own agenda. Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a Bill that will protect school age girls from having to compete against boys in sports. That is a no-brainer. There are physical differences between the two genders and that is WHY there ARE girls' teams in the first place. No one wanted to watch them play against each other, but activists pushed for the creation of girls' teams, and they have been supported ever since. Now ANOTHER group of activists want to take DOWN girls' teams by allowing boys who either think they are girls or who just want to claim to be so to play against girls, where their natural advantage makes the results of such competition appallingly unfair. Callin a defense of woman a BAN on Transgresion is reminiscent of the media's calling a defense of marriage a BAN on "gay marriage". It worked once, so why not use it again? No American wants to BAN anaything, right? Do not let them fool you. The BAN will be on girls' sports, and the media will never mention it.

Federal Judge Rules Against Women in Transgression Bill...

 Just as with coverage of "Marriage Equality" several years ago, the media has chosen a side in reportage on Transgression, and that's the anti-woman side. In the case of marriage any vote by states or rules/laws issued by the Federal Government that adhered to the definition of marriage was reported on as a "Ban on Gay Marriage", which ignored the obvious OTHER forms of "marriage" which were also "banned" by defining marriage by procreative possibilities defined by Biology. Americans being anti "Banning" by Nature (a fact that is changing as the country alters its demographics), soon there was an upswing in those who were open to "gay marriage", and who might likely be open to polyamory and/or Bigamy had they been pushed. The Supreme Court wasn't willing to take any chances that the peasants would vote THEIR way, though, and since they are BETTER than us, THEY ruled instead.

  Now we have the Judicial Branch and the Media teaming up against women (and children) as the media gleefully report that a Virginia school board's attempt to allow women/girls a safe space has been ruled "unconstitutional" by a FEDERAL Appeals Court, which means that the Supremes might eventually rule on this as well. In an effort not to rile up the women the case is made by a biological woman who demands to use male facilities, which is cunning and not at all the "norm" in these situations. Any male can recall women/girls in mens rest rooms at concerts, etc. when the lines for the women's rest rooms were intimidating, and we generally do not care, because we're guys. Ordinarily, as well, men don't have that many biological females taking our jobs, out-competing us in sports, or being offered gigs over us as the other gender does, and that's what's insidious about this case.