Marriage Equality Now!

One of the arguments for redefining marriage was that there needed to be "marriage equality", and who could argue against "equality"? Of course the Gaystapo had zero interest in such a thing, but the slogan worked. And while the media dutifully decried "gay marriage bans" as some states voted to retain the traditional biologically-based marriage definition, they also managed to avoid the ACTUAL bans ongoing of bigamy and any form of "poly" marriages, because GAY marriage, and NOT "marriage equality" was the end goal. Eventually, though, the problem ought to be dealt with that once gender is no longer a part of the definition then the number of adults involved should be meaningless as well. Why NOT three adults, of whichever genders? Why wouldn't a criminal gang just all marry each other, as that would prevent them from being obligated to testify against the other spouses in court?
  At the end of the day, Government should not be interested in who you love any more than in how and in what positions. Government's interest in marriage was about affording the best opportunity for the next generation potentially resulting from that marriage. In that case, bigamy is far more in the Government's interest to make legal than gay marriage ever was.
  It looks as if there might be some challenges facing the "law of the land" after all, and it's starting in Utah, of course.