President Trump has suggested that Supremes Sotomayor and Ginsburg, Liberal activists, should recuse themselves from decisions directly pertaining to his Administration and their hatred thereof. I couldn't agree more. Ginsgurg especially has a history of not recusing when she clearly should, as when she and Elena Kagan, both having OFFICIATED "gay weddings" not surprisingly ruled to redefine marriage, rather than sitting that decision out.
The problem with Sotomayor and Ginsburg is that they sit on a Court where they are alleged to be weighing decisions that they publicly address at every opportunity. The obvious choice to any lay person if he or she were asked to perform a same-sex wedding would be "I am sorry, but either you and your intended will have to wait or perhaps find someone who will not be weighing in on the Constitutionality of the issue in the near future."The fact that such an answer is not blatantly obvious to a JUSTICE would call into question his or her ability to be impartial.
Of course, if I were President Trump, or Rand Paul, I would be calling for not just the recusal, but the Impeachment of Chief Justice John Roberts, who refused to utter the NAME of Eric Ciaramello, asserting ion so doing, that the prevaricator is in fact some sort of whistleblower, which one cannot be if no wrongdoing occurred to blow a whistle on.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pelosi Pulls Out an Old Staple...
Using a tired claim that is almost as old as she is, Pelosi accuses Russia of being behind the antisemitic protests she detests. Free Speec...
-
Using a tired claim that is almost as old as she is, Pelosi accuses Russia of being behind the antisemitic protests she detests. Free Speec...
-
Forget the CW's "Dynasty" series (on its third 'Crystal' AND 'Alexis' in its third season, and filmed here i...
-
For the Vice-Presidential debate to take place Wednesday, October 07, current Vice President Mike Pence and Senatrix Kamala Harris-Emhoff w...

No comments:
Post a Comment