New York Times Believes SOME Women...

Former Biden staffer (get your mind OUT of the gutter!) Tara Reade (no, not THAT one) is claiming that some 30 years ago, when she could not afford underwear, and he still had all his marbles, the then-Senator made an unwanted advance upon her of a sexual nature. Unlike his current modus operandi, he apparently was not interested in the hair on her head, and was more interested in below-the-neck regions. After the media, who gleefully pursued such truthtellers as Anita Hill, Chrissie Boozy-Ford, and Julie Sweatnik, because they had "credibly" accused conservatives of sexual harassment and even criminal assaults, were called out for their obvious double standard in ignoring Reade's claims (triple standard if one includes allegations against Cory Booker by males) the New York Times went "in depth" to make it look as if they were taking her "claims" seriously, while preparing a defense of their candidate for President. Naturally they found that Biden was innocent and that Reade has no basis for her allegation, and that some women are NOT to be just believed. Let's see if they hold to that the next time a woman accuses a conservative guy..