Federal Judge Rules Against Women in Transgression Bill...

 Just as with coverage of "Marriage Equality" several years ago, the media has chosen a side in reportage on Transgression, and that's the anti-woman side. In the case of marriage any vote by states or rules/laws issued by the Federal Government that adhered to the definition of marriage was reported on as a "Ban on Gay Marriage", which ignored the obvious OTHER forms of "marriage" which were also "banned" by defining marriage by procreative possibilities defined by Biology. Americans being anti "Banning" by Nature (a fact that is changing as the country alters its demographics), soon there was an upswing in those who were open to "gay marriage", and who might likely be open to polyamory and/or Bigamy had they been pushed. The Supreme Court wasn't willing to take any chances that the peasants would vote THEIR way, though, and since they are BETTER than us, THEY ruled instead.

  Now we have the Judicial Branch and the Media teaming up against women (and children) as the media gleefully report that a Virginia school board's attempt to allow women/girls a safe space has been ruled "unconstitutional" by a FEDERAL Appeals Court, which means that the Supremes might eventually rule on this as well. In an effort not to rile up the women the case is made by a biological woman who demands to use male facilities, which is cunning and not at all the "norm" in these situations. Any male can recall women/girls in mens rest rooms at concerts, etc. when the lines for the women's rest rooms were intimidating, and we generally do not care, because we're guys. Ordinarily, as well, men don't have that many biological females taking our jobs, out-competing us in sports, or being offered gigs over us as the other gender does, and that's what's insidious about this case.